|
|
Die-cast
Copper Motor Rotors: Motor Test Results, Copper Compared to Aluminum
|
Edwin
F. Brush, Jr.1, John G.
Cowie2, Dale T. Peters3,
and Darryl J. Van Son4
1BBF
Associates, 68 Gun Club Lane, Weston, MA 02193 USA
2Vice
President, Copper Development Association Inc., 260 Madison Ave.,
New York, NY 10016 USA
3Senior
Advisor, CDA Inc. 27 Raintree Lane, Hilton Head Island, SC 29926
USA
4Van
Son Consultants, 4500 Mount Harmony Road, Greenwood, AR 72936
USA
Introduction
Motor
manufacturers have long realized that because the electrical conductivity
of copper is nearly 60% higher than that of aluminum, substituting
copper for alumi-num in the squirrel cage of the induction motor
would markedly increase the elec-trical energy efficiency of the
machine. Most motors larger than about 200 kW and a few special
purpose smaller motors are built with copper squirrel cage struc-tures
manufactured by a time consuming and costly fabrication process.
The intri-cate squirrel cage of smaller motors is produced by
pressure die casting aluminum. Alternative cost-effective manufacturing
methods have not been devised. A major barrier to adoption of
copper for the rotor has been the high cost resulting from the
short die life of the ordinary die steels experienced in die casting
copper with its high melting temperature (1083ºC compared
to 660ºC for aluminum).
The incentive to solve the problem of short die life and resulting
high manufac-turing costs is the 15 to 20% reduction in overall
motor energy losses that motor manufacturer models have shown
to be possible if copper were utilized in the ro-tor achieving
significant energy savings. The U.S. Department of Energy has
re-ported that motors larger than 1/6 Hp (1/8 kW) use about 60%
of all electricity generated in the United States and that medium
power motors (1 to 125 Hp, 0.75 to100 kW) use about 60% of electricity
supplied to all motors [1]. In another pa-per at this conference,
we have presented the results of a major effort to identify suitable
high-temperature die materials and to adapt them to cost effective
copper die casting. This work showed that use of nickel-base alloy
dies operated at 625 to 650ºC is the path to much extended
die life.
This paper summarizes the results of copper rotor die casting
trials for four mo-tor manufacturers and the results of manufacturer’s
tests of performance of motors equipped with copper rotors compared
to the counterpart aluminum rotors. Avail-able data from the literature
on motors with copper rotors is also summarized with the new data.
A more complete account of details of the rotor die casting and
mo-tor performance tests has been presented and published [2].
Experimental
Method
Copper
rotors were cast for four motor companies for evaluation in their
own fa-cilities. These rotors were pressure die cast in a 660-Tonne
real-time shot con-trolled Buhler horizontal machine using H-13
die inserts. Ordinary tool steel dies were used because only a
few rotors were required for testing. These die inserts were mounted
in a three-platen master mold assembly of the type conventionally
used in rotor die casting.
Chopped copper wire rod was inductively melted on a shot-by-shot
just-in-time basis to avoid a large holding furnace and the attendant
problems of control of oxygen and hydrogen in the molten copper
over an extended time. The copper was heated to 1230 °C providing
about 150 °C of superheat.
To maintain superheat, a heated shot sleeve surrounded with a
thermal wrap was used. The shot sleeves were specifically sized
for each rotor size to minimize air entrapment and porosity in
the casting.
The real-time shot control capability of the die casting machine
provided oppor-tunity to study a number of die casting variables
that might affect the quality of the cast copper and the performance
of the rotors in motor tests. On the machine used, ram speed can
be set at a number of positions and final compacting pressure
and duration are adjustable. A wide range of these variables was
used to assess the sensitivity of the copper die casting process
to machine operating parameters [2].
Because copper is so much hotter than aluminum entering the conductor
bar channels, there was some concern that the conductor bar might
weld to iron lami-nations or that the properties of the iron would
be compromised by heat treatment. Welding of laminations to the
copper would increase the magnetic loss component of the total
motor losses. On ejection from the machine, half the rotors were
water quenched on the theory that rapid cooling would shrink the
copper from the iron and would minimize high temperature annealing
of the iron. The other half was al-lowed to air cool.
Motor
Performance Tests
A
total of about 140 rotors were cast for four motor manufacturers
to evaluate in their own laboratories. Three companies used dynamometer
efficiency tests as per IEEE Specification 112, test method B,
as required in the U. S. by the National Electrical Manufacturers
Association (NEMA) and the Energy Policy Act of 1992 (EPAct).
The fourth company used the IEC 34-2 test method. The IEC method
as-sumes a fixed percentage as stray load losses. The IEEE test
method is a true watts in vs. watts out efficiency test that segregates
the energy losses into five categories of Iron Core Losses, Stator
Resistance, Rotor Resistance, Windage and Friction and Stray Load
Losses.
The first four are measured directly and the remainder is in the
“stray load” category. For reasons explained below,
stray load losses are reduced by the copper rotor and it is therefore
important to determine this loss rather than assume a value for
it.
To ensure an accurate comparison with the corresponding aluminum
rotor, a single wound stator was used to test all rotors in each
test program.
Participating motor manufacturers were assured confidentiality.
Each agreed to disclose test data, but at their request, are not
identified.
15
Hp (11.2 kW) Motor
The
first copper rotors cast were for a 15 Hp (11.2 kW) motor and
were 5.7 inches (144.8 mm) in diameter with a 6-inch stack height
containing 14 lbs (6.4 kg) of copper in the conductor bars and
end rings. It is important to note that the lamina-tions used
here were designed for aluminum; i.e. the slot design had not
been op-timized for copper. A number of rotors were cast covering
three different injection pressures and one-half were water quenched.
Seven rotors covering these process variables were tested and
compared to a large database of similar aluminum rotor motors
averaged as a “typical” motor. The same “standard”
stator was tested seven times, yielding a spread of stator re-sistance
losses ranging from 502 watts to 522 watts. This represents an
approxi-mate plus or minus 2% testing error which was assumed
to be applicable across all test data. Applying this logic, the
data for stator resistance and core iron magnetic loss have been
averaged and considered a constant in both copper and aluminum
rotors since they are not affected by rotor material.
Test
Results
The test results were remarkably consistent across all process
variables. The key measure of efficiency yielded virtually no
difference with 90.7% as average and variation of only plus or
minus 0.1 percentage points. Rotor watts loss aver-aged 157 watts
with a maximum variation from 153 to 167 watts. With only seven
tests, no pattern could be discerned relative to any of the process
variables. The conclusion is that the process is very robust and
process variations within the range tested have no predictable
effect on final performance results. Although the post-casting
cooling method seemed to have no effect on the results, water
quenching reduced handling time to one minute versus a 20-minute
air-cooling time. This would allow much faster production in a
manufacturing plant.
From the remarkable consistency of the test results, we conclude
that the cast-ing process is most viable. Results variations were
all within test measurement accuracy and no pattern emerged reflecting
die casting variables. When compared to historical variation in
aluminum rotor motors, these copper rotors were so con-sistent
as to deem the data variation insignificant.
Table 1 shows the IEEE test results as averages for seven rotors
tested Rotor re-sistance losses are the key item in rotor material
substitution and yielded a 40%reduction in measured losses. This
represents 80% of the theoretical maxi-mum value possible in the
conductivity difference between rotor materials. This is a very
good start for a first attempt at real motors and may be improved
further with detail lamination slot design.
Table 1. IEEE loss segregation test results for 15 Hp (11.2
kW) motor
|
Al
(W) |
Cu
(W) |
∆W
|
%
|
Stator
Resistance |
507 |
507 |
0
|
0 |
Iron
Core Loss |
286 |
286 |
0 |
0 |
Rotor
Resistance |
261 |
157 |
-104 |
-40 |
Windage
& Friction |
115 |
72 |
-43 |
-37 |
Stray
Load Losses |
137 |
105 |
-32 |
-23 |
Totals
|
1306 |
1127 |
-179 |
-14 |
Windage and friction losses are mechanical losses retarding rotation.
Al-though these seem to have no relevance to rotor material, they
do in this case. The copper rotors cast were had smooth end rings
except for projections for balancing weights. They did not include
cooling fins on the end rings. With a lower resis-tance rotor,
less heat is generated to be dissipated. These rotors, lacking
fins, were adjoined on the shaft with an internal circulating
fan for stator cooling. These fans are more efficient as they
can be sized for their circulating job without having to dissipate
rotor heat. As a result, when compared to aluminum rotors with
fins, to-tal windage loses were down 37% from 115 watts to 72
watts. Friction in the bearings is assumed to be the same. The
cooler running copper rotors allow re-duced windage losses via
a more efficient internal fan and reduce the amount of copper
required by eliminating the rotor end ring fins.
Stray load losses are the cumulative effect of magnetic transfer
efficiency be-tween the stationary stator and the rotating rotor
as experienced in the air gap be-tween the two. Consistent air
gap and rotor balance also affect stray load losses and there
is an electrical component to the magnetic transfer efficiency.
Consis-tency in conductivity of rotor conduction bars is critical
to proper induction mag-netic transfer. Porosity or nonmetallic
inclusions in cast rotor bars can result in variation in effective
rotor bar cross sectional area, and therefore resistance, result-ing
in variation in the magnetic field in the air gap. This increases
stray load losses via inconsistent magnetic flux density between
stator and rotor reducing overall efficiency. The seven copper
rotors exhibited such rotor bar consistency so as to reduce stray
load losses by 23%, from 137 watts to 105 watts. A more ac-curate
and consistent casting process might possibly produce similar
stay load im-provements in aluminum rotors. It is clear that the
die-cast copper rotors contrib-uted to the overall motor efficiency
via a consistency not normally achieved in typical motor production.
The substitution of copper as rotor material directly achieved
58% of the total savings and was materially involved in saving
the other 24% in windage losses and 18% in casting accuracy stray
load losses. The combination resulted in 179 watts of savings
or a total of 14% reduction in total losses. These results support
the efficacy of both the material and the process. The rotors
did not require bal-ancing weights usually used to compensate
for rotor bar inconsistencies.
Other
Performance Measures
In
addition to the loss measurements, the test method itemizes performance
issues such as temperature rise above ambient, full load speed
and power factor (Table 2). These data reveal a motor having different
characteristics than a typical alu-minum rotor motor. Overall
efficiency resulted in a solid addition of 1.2 percent-age points
added directly to the motor nameplate efficiency. This is significant
in that 20 years of motor efficiency improvements have already
utilized all of the easy things that reduce losses. Copper rotors
represent one of the largest possible reductions in losses without
using amorphous steels or superconducting, still ex-otic and very
expensive alternatives.
Table 2. Performance characteristics of 15 Hp (11.2 kW) motor
|
Al
|
Cu
|
Difference
|
%
Change |
Efficiency
|
89.5
|
90.7 |
+1.2 |
+1.4 |
Temperature
Rise, °C |
64.0
|
59.5 |
-4.5 |
-7.0 |
Full
Load RPM |
1760
|
1775 |
+15 |
+0.85 |
Slip,
% |
2.22
|
1.37 |
-0.85 |
-38 |
Power
Factor, % |
81.5
|
79.0 |
-2.5 |
-3 |
Temperature rise above ambient is significant in the life expectancy
of the motor. The general rule of thumb in the motor industry
is that for every 10 degrees Centi-grade hotter a motor runs,
life expectancy can be cut in half. With nearly 5°C re-duction
in the copper motor temperature rise, we can expect a possible
50% in-crease in motor life when the motor is operated near design
capacity. Only real field tests and time would be able to prove
this hypothesis, but similar results have appeared in premium
efficiency motors. Power factor is down slightly (3%) but is very
near measurement accuracy levels. Power factor is only an issue
if the elec-tric power utility measures a low power factor for
the entire factory facility.
Slip
is the difference between the synchronous RPM of the field rotation
at 60 Hz (or 50 Hz elsewhere in the world) and the full load RPM
of the rotor and shaft assembly. This difference is what creates
the torque to rotate the load. The cop-per rotors achieve this
torque point with less slip or a higher measured RPM. The implications
of a “stiff” motor or one that does not slow down
much under load and the higher full load RPM are discussed in
Ref. [2]. Starting, breakdown and locked rotor torque values are
somewhat reduced in the copper rotor motor and again are discussed
in Ref. [2]. Since we have simply substituted copper for alu-minum
with no design change to accommodate the copper, these torque
factors could be corrected with changes in the cross sectional
shape of the rotor bars not necessarily requiring an increase
in total copper cross sectional area and cost.
Other
Motors Tested
In
the larger 25 Hp (18.5 kW) motor, the end rings were 6.5 inches
(165 mm) in diameter with a stack height of 9.5 inches (241 mm).
The squirrel cage contained 11.4 kg of copper and required melting
17.7kg of copper per shot. The motor manufacturer provided sufficient
laminations for 14 rotors. Motor tests of this second set of larger
rotors showed even more dramatic results. This in part is due
to the use of a rotor lamination slot design specifically designed
for copper.
Again there was remarkable consistency in the results for the
four rotors tested and compared to the same motor with an aluminum
rotor. The rotor losses were 40% lower in the copper rotors and
the overall losses were reduced by 23 %. Lower losses led to reduced
rotor and stator temperatures. On completion of tests, the temperature
of the stator winding of the motor with the copper rotor was 32°C
cooler that the aluminum design; the copper rotor was 29°C
cooler than the alumi-num rotor. Lower running temperatures mean
that smaller internal cooling fans can be used and this had a
significant effect in reducing the parasitic component of the
friction and windage losses on this motor designed for the copper
rotor. Motor temperature translates directly to motor life and
maintenance costs. Motors with cast copper rotors, with proper
maintenance, would be expected to last longer and be more reliable.
A set of rotors cast for another motor company were for a 4 Hp
(3 kW) motor. The end ring was 3.54 inches (90 mm) in diameter,
stack height 6.1 inches (155 mm) and contained 3.2 kg of copper.
Overall motor losses were reduced by 21% with the copper rotor
compared to the conventional aluminum.
Copper rotors for a 5 Hp (3.7 kW) motor were cast for a fourth
manufacturer. Rotor I²R losses were reduced by 38% compared
to the aluminum counterpart mo-tor, but surprisingly, the iron
core loss component was much higher for the motor with the copper
rotor. This was apparently due to insufficient consideration of
the rotor and stator lamination designs from the aluminum rotor
motor used. It ap-pears the iron was almost totally saturated
in the aluminum design. The higher current in the copper rotor
could not further magnetize the iron and appeared as a large apparent
loss.
As shown in Table 3, I²R losses for all motors fitted with
copper rotors from this test program showed rotor reductions of
about 40% with one smaller motor showing an even greater reduction.
Table 3. Rotor I2R
losses – copper vs. aluminum
HP
|
kW
|
Poles
|
Al
|
Cu
|
Difference
|
%
|
4
|
3
|
4
|
221
|
92
|
129
|
-58
|
5
|
3.7
|
4
|
--*
|
--*
|
--*
|
-38
|
15
|
11
|
4
|
262
|
157
|
104
|
-40
|
25
|
19
|
4
|
410
|
292
|
118
|
-40
|
*Actual
loss values not reported
Metallurgical
examination of cast copper rotors confirmed that there was no
in-teraction between the copper conductor bars and iron laminations.
Chemical analysis revealed that small amounts of iron (10 to 11
ppm) and oxygen (0.084 to 0.163 wt. %) were picked up during casting.
The combined effects of the pres-ence of microstructural defects
and chemical contamination reduced the electrical conductivity
of the cast copper conductor bars only slightly to 96.8 and 98.7%
IACS in the two measurements performed on the first set of rotors
cast.
Porosity in the far end ring of the first set of copper rotors
appeared to be 2 to 3 percent but did not extend into the conductor
bars. The uniformity of conduction paths in these copper rotors
shows up as a reduction in stray load losses and had not been
expected. No balancing to compensate for uneven weight distribution
was required. The larger rotors of the second group cast were
more of a problem in this regard showing as much as 25% voids
in the first shots and 8 to 10% in the rotors tested for electrical
performance. This is apparently due to inadequate venting at the
far end ring and excessive oxygen pick-up during the very long
melting time (about 13 min.) resulting from the small power supply
available. This porosity had little apparent effect on the performance
of these copper rotors. Die cast aluminum rotors very often have
considerable porosity requiring use of extra aluminum to compensate
for porosity and always require balancing.
Copper
Rotor Literature Data
Table
4 summarizes the overall motor efficiencies and loss reductions
observed in motors fitted with copper rotors where comparisons
with aluminum are reported in the literature including the data
of this study. A broad range of motor power from 4 Hp (3kw) to
270Hp (200kw) is covered. A clear pattern of increased efficiencies
with higher values for the larger motors and loss reductions averaging
14.7% is evident.
Conclusions
The
motor performance tests reported here have verified years of calculations
on the part of motor manufacturers about the prospective benefits
of incorporating copper in the squirrel cage structure. The results
show conclusively that overall motor energy losses are reduced
by an average 14% and the nameplate efficiency is increased by
at least a full percentage point.
Acknowledgements
This
project was sponsored by the world copper industry the International
Copper Association, Ltd. and managed by the Copper Development
Association Inc. Ad-ditional funding was provided by the U. S.
Department of Energy Office of Indus-trial Technologies and the
Air Conditioning and Refrigeration Technical Institute. Several
major motor manufacturers underwrote the costs of rotor lamination
mate-rial, die inserts and in-house dynamometer testing of motors
equipped with die-cast rotors. Formcast, Inc., Denver, Colorado,
under Dr. Stephen P. Midson’s di-rection, provided the die
casting equipment and the casting expertise. Mr. Ruedi Beck of
DieTec, GmbH, Gossau, Switzerland, served to provide the die casting
tooling design and innovative approaches to the heated nickel
alloy die insert technology that is to be used in commercial production
of copper rotors.
Table
4. Overall motor efficiencies and loss reductions via copper
rotors- data from this study and the literature
Hp
|
kW
|
Poles
|
Eff.
Al
|
Eff.
Cu
|
Diff.
|
Loss
Reduction,
%
|
Reference
|
4
|
3
|
4
|
83.2
|
86.4
|
3.2
|
19.0
|
This
study |
7.5
|
5.5
|
4
|
74.0
|
79.0
|
5.0
|
19.2
|
3
|
10
|
7.5
|
4
|
85.0
|
86.5
|
1.5
|
10.0
|
4
|
15
|
11.2
|
4
|
89.5
|
90.7
|
1.2
|
11.4
|
This
study |
25
|
18.8
|
4
|
90.9
|
92.5
|
1.6
|
17.6
|
This
study |
40
|
30
|
4
|
88.8
|
90.1
|
1.3
|
11.6
|
5
|
120
|
90
|
2
|
91.4
|
92.8
|
1.4
|
16.3
|
5
|
270
|
200
|
4
|
92.0
|
93.0
|
1.0
|
12.5
|
3
|
References
1.
DOE/CS-0147 – U. S. Department of Energy (1980) Classification
and evaluation of
electric motors and pumps.
2.
Peters DT, Van Son DJ, Cowie JG, Brush EF Jr.(2002) Improved energy
efficiency
and performance through the die-cast copper rotor. International
Conference on Electric
Machines, Brugge, Belgium
3.
Lie S, Di Pietro C (1995) Copper die-cast rotor efficiency improvement
and
economic consideration. IEEE Trans. Energy Convers. 10 No. 3:
419-424
4..
Poloujadoff M, Mipo JC, Nurdin M (1995) Some economical comparisons
between
aluminum and copper squirrel cages. IEEE Trans Energy Convers.
10 No. 3: 415-418
5.
Private communication with manufacturer.
|
|